![]() ![]() But I’d be interested in a little feedback from others before going down that path. I realize the only way to know if an NAA/renderer is a good alternative is to buy one and try it out. I like the features/functions of the Node 2i its SQ is pretty good, but I prefer the Audirvana-over-USB sound.The latter seems to create a better soundstage (+ equal/better timbre/tonality, separation, detail … with less harshness in complex arrangements, high volumes, or high frequencies). The Mini runs Roon Core as well as Audirvana I’ve also set it up to be a Roon endpoint. ![]() I wonder if Roon would take on a similar sound signature when played through a NAA (network bridge), such as one of the Sonore rendu products? I’m also considering a used PS Audio DirectStream Junior, which would give me the option of either USB or ethernet connections.Ĭurrently I’m using either a Bluesound Node 2i or a Mac Mini patched directly by USB to my integrated amp (with built-in DAC). Agree w/many others that Roon’s UI is much better. ![]() I cannot identify precisely what the difference is and do not much like descriptions like “airy” or “warm”. It sounds great, better than Roon I think (on my gear that is). If you are interested in trying new stuff, I believe you may be surprised if you pursue the Ubuntu HQPlayer project.I’ve been trying Audirvana for the first time in the past couple days. If you paid for HQPlayer, you paid for the multiple platforms use as long as you are only using it on one PC at a time.ĭisclaimer: the sound experience I achieved is based on my PC and audio-hardware equipment, and of course, my ear. And if you own it, you owe yourself to give it a try to listen to the player under the Ubuntu OS system. And HQPlayer can be downloaded for a free trial if you don’t own it. Ubuntu OS is free and super-easy to install. I am talking about a music experience that has gone beyond simple sound quality.īut don’t believe me. Essentially, when I listen to Ubuntu’s HQPlayer, I cannot focus on anything else except the music. The music is engaging and pulls me away from whatever I am doing at the moment (like reading a book, etc.). I am utterly convinced that the “breakthrough” sound experience is better than any players I have listened to so far under the Windows-based system. I also tried to eliminate any placebo effect by going back and forth between the Windows version of HQPlayer and the Ubuntu HQPlayer. The sound quality is there, but more importantly, the music brought a sense of immersion to it. I did not install Ubuntu with my Windows drive plugged in because I did not want the Ubuntu boot manager to overwrite my Windows boot manager.Īnyway, after installing the HQPlayer Desktop 4 in my Ubuntu OS system, I found the sound utterly encapturing. I first installed Ubuntu OS in a separate SSD drive using F12 in my computer during boot time to select OS to boot. When someone used the word “optimize” in connection with music listening, I paid attention. One of the things I heard about HQPlayer is that the player is optimized for the Ubuntu Linux OS. However, I want to share my recent discovery that some of you may want to try (or not). ![]() I have already posted some comments on why I bought HQPlayer in the forums, so I will not rehash old thoughts. I see some discussion on HQPlayer here, so I am going to throw in my 2 cents. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |